{"id":8958,"date":"2021-04-01T13:13:55","date_gmt":"2021-04-01T13:13:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/?p=8958"},"modified":"2021-04-01T13:14:10","modified_gmt":"2021-04-01T13:14:10","slug":"marka-hakkina-tecavuz","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/","title":{"rendered":"Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131"},"content":{"rendered":"<style type=\"text\/css\" data-type=\"vc_cmsms_shortcodes-custom-css\"><\/style><h1>Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131<\/h1>\n<p>T.C. YARGITAY 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2004\/4268 K. 2005\/2362 T. 10.3.2005<\/p>\n<p>TANINMI\u015e MARKA HAKKINA TECAV\u00dcZ \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Markan\u0131n Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yararlanabilecek veya \u0130tibar\u0131n\u0131 Zedeleyecek Tarzdaki Markan\u0131n Farkl\u0131 Mal Kategorileri \u0130\u00e7in Bile Olsa Tesciline H\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p>MARKA HAKKINA TECAV\u00dcZ \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Markan\u0131n Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yararlanabilecek veya \u0130tibar\u0131n\u0131 Zedeleyecek Tarzdaki Markan\u0131n Farkl\u0131 Mal Kategorileri \u0130\u00e7in Bile Olsa Tesciline H\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi )<\/p>\n<p>G\u00d6REVL\u0130 MAHKEME ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131na Dayal\u0131 Marka Terkini Davas\u0131nda )<\/p>\n<p>KHK-556\/m.8\/2,71<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6ZET : Davac\u0131 taraf, daval\u0131n\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusuna itiraz\u0131nda markalar\u0131n benzerli\u011fine ve kendi markalar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a &#8220;\u00dcLKER&#8221; markas\u0131n\u0131n toplumda tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 8\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131n\u0131n tescilini istedi\u011fi &#8220;\u00dcLKEM&#8221; ibaresinin, tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131ktan yararlanmay\u0131 hedefledi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 8\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re tescil edilmi\u015f veya tescil i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f markan\u0131n toplumda ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k d\u00fczeyi nedeniyle haks\u0131z bir yarar\u0131n sa\u011flanabilece\u011fi, markan\u0131n itibar\u0131na zarar verilebilece\u011fi veya tescil i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f markan\u0131n ay\u0131rt edici karakterini zedeleyici sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilece\u011fi durumda, marka sahiplerinin itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine farkl\u0131 mal ve hizmetlerde kullan\u0131lacak olsa bile, sonraki markan\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusunun reddi gerekmektedir. \u00d6te yandan, 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;nin 71. maddesine g\u00f6re kararnamede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen davalarda g\u00f6revli mahkeme ihtisas mahkemeleridir. G\u00f6rev hususu Kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgili olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda resen nazara al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131ndan, mahkemece bu husus da de\u011ferlendirilerek sonucuna g\u00f6re karar verilmelidir. DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada Ankara Asliye 4. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi&#8217;nce verilen 04.04.2001 tarih ve 2000\/945 &#8211; 2001\/363 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca incelenmesi duru\u015fmal\u0131 olarak davac\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f olmakla, duru\u015fma i\u00e7in belirlenen 08.03.2005 g\u00fcnde davac\u0131 avukat\u0131 Teoman Seyithano\u011flu gelip, daval\u0131 avukat\u0131 tebligata ra\u011fmen gelmedi\u011finden temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin de s\u00fcresinde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131ktan ve duru\u015fmada haz\u0131r bulunan taraf avukat\u0131 dinlenildikten sonra, duru\u015fmal\u0131 i\u015flerin yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve s\u00fcre darl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6t\u00fcr\u00fc incelenerek karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 ileriye b\u0131rak\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi Ali Orhan taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlenildikten ve yine dosya i\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup incelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: KARAR : Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin &#8220;\u00dclker&#8221; lider markas\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7ok tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f markas\u0131 oldu\u011funu, daval\u0131 \u015firketin bu tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131ktan yararlanmak amac\u0131yla di\u011fer daval\u0131 Enstit\u00fc nazar\u0131nda &#8220;\u00dcLKEM&#8221; esas unsurunu ta\u015f\u0131yan markay\u0131 3- 5- 20. s\u0131n\u0131f emtialar i\u00e7in tescil ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011funu, an\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun ilan\u0131 \u00fczerine m\u00fcvekkilince itiraz edildi\u011fini, itiraz\u0131n nihai olarak Yeniden \u0130nceleme ve De\u011ferlendirme Kurulu&#8217;nca reddedildi\u011fini, oysa tescil i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lan markadaki &#8220;\u00dcLKEM&#8221; esas unsurunu ta\u015f\u0131yan ibarenin m\u00fcvekkilinin \u00e7ok tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f markas\u0131 olan &#8220;\u00dcLKER&#8221; ibaresi ile vasat t\u00fcketici nazar\u0131nda kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa neden olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu durumun 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 8\/b maddesinin ikinci b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde yer alan d\u00fczenlemeye ve 7\/b-1 maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmas\u0131 nedeniyle tescil i\u015flemlerinin iptali gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, daval\u0131 Enstit\u00fc&#8217;n\u00fcn Yeniden \u0130nceleme ve De\u011ferlendirme Kurulu karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali ile di\u011fer daval\u0131n\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusunda yer alan &#8220;\u00dcLKEM&#8221; ibaresinin markadan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na\/terkinine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 Enstit\u00fc Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 vekili, di\u011fer daval\u0131n\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011fu markan\u0131n &#8220;\u015eekil+\u00dc\u0130S \u00dcLKEM&#8221; ibarelerinden olu\u015ftu\u011funu ve davac\u0131n\u0131n markas\u0131 ile farkl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle davac\u0131n\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131n reddedildi\u011fini savunarak davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 \u015firket temsilcisi, her iki \u015firketin faaliyet alanlar\u0131n\u0131n farkl\u0131 oldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f markas\u0131 ile m\u00fcvekkilinin tescil ba\u015fvurusunda bulundu\u011fu markan\u0131n farkl\u0131 anlamlar\u0131 bulundu\u011funu savunarak, davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, toplanan kan\u0131tlara g\u00f6re, 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;nin 7\/b maddesinde ayn\u0131 veya ayn\u0131 t\u00fcrdeki mal ve hizmetler ile ilgili olarak tescil edilmi\u015f veya daha \u00f6nce tescili i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir markan\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve ayr\u0131ca markalar\u0131n ay\u0131rt edilemeyecek kadar ayn\u0131 olmas\u0131n\u0131n tescil a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ret nedeni olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, somut olayda ise davac\u0131n\u0131n markas\u0131n\u0131n g\u0131da maddeleri i\u00e7in tescilli daval\u0131n\u0131n ise zirai ila\u00e7lar i\u00e7in tescil ba\u015fvurusunun oldu\u011fu, \u00f6te yandan davac\u0131n\u0131n markas\u0131n\u0131n &#8220;\u00dcLKER&#8221; daval\u0131n\u0131n tescil isteminde bulundu\u011fu markas\u0131n\u0131n ise &#8220;\u015eekil+\u00dc\u0130S \u00dcLKEM&#8221; kelimelerinden olu\u015ftu\u011fu, her iki markan\u0131n ayn\u0131 ya da ay\u0131rt edilemeyecek kadar benzer olmad\u0131klar\u0131, 7\/1 maddesinin ise tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f marka ile ayn\u0131 ya da benzer mallar i\u00e7in tescili yasakland\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan somut olayda uygulama olana\u011f\u0131 bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, 8\/b maddesinde \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen her iki markan\u0131n da kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusunun &#8220;\u015eekil+\u00dc\u0130S&#8221; ibarelerinin de kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. Karar\u0131 davac\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir. 1- Dava dosyas\u0131 i\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen ve a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki bentler kapsam\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kalan di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddi gerekmi\u015ftir. 2- Ancak, davac\u0131 taraf, daval\u0131n\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusuna itiraz\u0131nda markalar\u0131n benzerli\u011fine ve kendi markalar\u0131n\u0131n tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dayanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a &#8220;\u00dcLKER&#8221; markas\u0131n\u0131n toplumda tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ve 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 8\/2 maddesi gere\u011fince daval\u0131n\u0131n tescilini istedi\u011fi &#8220;\u00dcLKEM&#8221; ibaresinin, tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131ktan yararlanmay\u0131 hedefledi\u011fini belirtmi\u015ftir. 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;n\u0131n 8\/2. maddesine g\u00f6re tescil edilmi\u015f veya tescil i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f markan\u0131n toplumda ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k d\u00fczeyi nedeniyle haks\u0131z bir yarar\u0131n sa\u011flanabilece\u011fi, markan\u0131n itibar\u0131na zarar verilebilece\u011fi veya tescil i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurusu yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f markan\u0131n ay\u0131rt edici karakterini zedeleyici sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furabilece\u011fi durumda, marka sahiplerinin itiraz\u0131 \u00fczerine farkl\u0131 mal ve hizmetlerde kullan\u0131lacak olsa bile, sonraki markan\u0131n tescil ba\u015fvurusunun reddi gerekmektedir. An\u0131lan yasal d\u00fczenleme \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde toplumda tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131k d\u00fczeyinin davac\u0131 yanca kan\u0131tlanmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Mahkemenin toplumda tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131n tespitinde esas al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken kriterler Kanun H\u00fckm\u00fcnde Kararname de belirtilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen 1999 tarihli &#8220;WIPO Ortak Tavsiye Kararlar\u0131&#8221; ad\u0131 alt\u0131ndaki \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlerden yararlan\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r. Bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctler k\u0131saca; a ) Toplumun ilgili kesiminde markan\u0131n tan\u0131nma derecesi b ) Markan\u0131n kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 co\u011frafi alan, kullan\u0131m s\u00fcresi ve yo\u011funlu\u011fu c ) Marka promosyonlar\u0131n\u0131n hedef ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 alan, promosyon s\u00fcresi ve yo\u011funlu\u011fu d ) Markan\u0131n tesciller veya tescil ba\u015fvurular\u0131 ile korundu\u011fu co\u011frafi alan\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc e ) Markan\u0131n resmi makamlarca tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131na delalet eden karar ve uygulamalar\u0131 f ) Markan\u0131n ekonomik de\u011feridir. Bu \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fctlere uygunlu\u011fun belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan teknik bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. O halde mahkemece, bu kapsamda bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n eksik inceleme sonucu h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir. 3- 556 say\u0131l\u0131 KHK&#8217;nin 71. maddesine g\u00f6re kararnamede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen davalarda g\u00f6revli mahkeme ihtisas mahkemeleridir. G\u00f6rev hususu Kamu d\u00fczeni ile ilgili olmas\u0131 nedeniyle yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda resen nazara al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131ndan, 20.11.2003 tarih ve 537 say\u0131l\u0131 Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Y\u00fcksek Kurulu Karar\u0131 gere\u011fince mahkemece g\u00f6rev hususunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan da karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir. SONU\u00c7 : Yukar\u0131da 1 nolu bentte a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle davac\u0131 vekilinin di\u011fer temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, 2 ve 3 nolu bentlerde a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle karar\u0131n BOZULMASINA, takdir edilen 400,00 YTL. duru\u015fma vekillik \u00fccretinin daval\u0131dan al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine, \u00f6dedi\u011fi temyiz pe\u015fin harc\u0131n iste\u011fi halinde temyiz edene iadesine, 10.03.2005 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131 T.C. YARGITAY 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2004\/4268 K. 2005\/2362 T. 10.3.2005 TANINMI\u015e MARKA HAKKINA TECAV\u00dcZ \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Markan\u0131n Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yararlanabilecek veya \u0130tibar\u0131n\u0131 Zedeleyecek Tarzdaki Markan\u0131n Farkl\u0131 Mal Kategorileri \u0130\u00e7in Bile Olsa Tesciline H\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi ) MARKA HAKKINA TECAV\u00dcZ \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Markan\u0131n Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yararlanabilecek veya \u0130tibar\u0131n\u0131 Zedeleyecek Tarzdaki Markan\u0131n Farkl\u0131&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[31,32],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v15.9.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131 - Aytekin Hukuk<\/title>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ar_AR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131 - Aytekin Hukuk\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Marka Hakk\u0131na Tecav\u00fcz \u0130ddias\u0131 T.C. YARGITAY 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2004\/4268 K. 2005\/2362 T. 10.3.2005 TANINMI\u015e MARKA HAKKINA TECAV\u00dcZ \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Markan\u0131n Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yararlanabilecek veya \u0130tibar\u0131n\u0131 Zedeleyecek Tarzdaki Markan\u0131n Farkl\u0131 Mal Kategorileri \u0130\u00e7in Bile Olsa Tesciline H\u00fckmedilemeyece\u011fi ) MARKA HAKKINA TECAV\u00dcZ \u0130DD\u0130ASI ( Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f Markan\u0131n Tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan Yararlanabilecek veya \u0130tibar\u0131n\u0131 Zedeleyecek Tarzdaki Markan\u0131n Farkl\u0131...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Aytekin Hukuk\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-04-01T13:13:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-04-01T13:14:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"\u0648\u0642\u062a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0627\u0621\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u064f\u0642\u062f\u0651\u0631\">\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"5 \u062f\u0642\u0627\u0626\u0642\">\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Aytekin Hukuk\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\",\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ar\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/\",\"name\":\"Tan\\u0131nm\\u0131\\u015f Marka Hakk\\u0131na Tecav\\u00fcz \\u0130ddias\\u0131 - Aytekin Hukuk\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-04-01T13:13:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-04-01T13:14:10+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e0d38a2a3c592f997f25899cc8767812\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"item\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/\",\"name\":\"Home\"}},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"item\":{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/marka-hakkina-tecavuz\/\",\"name\":\"Tan\\u0131nm\\u0131\\u015f Marka Hakk\\u0131na Tecav\\u00fcz \\u0130ddias\\u0131\"}}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/e0d38a2a3c592f997f25899cc8767812\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/en\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"ar\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d10ca8d11301c2f4993ac2279ce4b930?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8958"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8958"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8958\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8959,"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8958\/revisions\/8959"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8958"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8958"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aytekinavukatlik.com\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8958"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}